South Dakota Rejects Recreational Marijuana Legalization for the Third Time
In the November 2024 election, South Dakota voters once again rejected a measure to legalize recreational marijuana, marking the third unsuccessful attempt by advocates to pass such legislation. This latest decision highlights the persistent division within the state over cannabis legalization and signals the challenges advocates face in gaining support for recreational cannabis in South Dakota.
The Proposal: What Was on the Ballot?
The 2024 ballot measure, referred to as Initiated Measure 29, aimed to legalize recreational cannabis use for adults aged 21 and older. The measure proposed several key provisions, including the legalization of possession, use, and distribution of marijuana within specific limits. Under the proposed law, adults could legally possess up to two ounces of marijuana, 16 grams of cannabis concentrate, and 1,600 milligrams of THC in cannabis products. Additionally, the initiative would have permitted adults to cultivate up to six marijuana plants per person, with a maximum of 12 plants allowed per household. It also outlined restrictions on public consumption and preserved employers’ rights to maintain drug-free workplaces.
The proposal sought to create a regulated framework for the recreational cannabis market, similar to what other states with legalized marijuana have established. Supporters of the measure argued that it would generate tax revenue, create jobs, and contribute to public health and safety by providing a controlled, regulated market for cannabis products. Despite these arguments, the measure ultimately did not pass.
A Rocky History: Previous Attempts at Legalization
This is not the first time South Dakotans have voted on cannabis legalization. In fact, the 2024 ballot initiative was the third major attempt to change the state’s cannabis laws in recent years.
The first significant move toward legalization occurred in 2020, when South Dakota voters approved Constitutional Amendment A, a ballot measure that sought to legalize recreational marijuana. However, this victory for advocates was short-lived. Shortly after the measure passed, South Dakota’s Supreme Court overturned it in 2021, citing the single-subject rule, which restricts ballot measures to a single issue. The court ruled that the measure encompassed multiple subjects and deemed it a revision rather than an amendment to the state constitution, effectively nullifying the voter-approved initiative.
In 2022, advocates introduced Initiated Measure 27, a scaled-back version of the original proposal that focused solely on recreational cannabis legalization. However, this measure also faced opposition and was ultimately rejected by voters, with approximately 53% voting against it and 47% in favor.
Reasons for Opposition: Health, Safety, and Economic Concerns
The 2024 initiative faced significant opposition from various groups, each raising different concerns about the potential impact of legalization. Opponents argued that recreational marijuana use could lead to negative health and societal outcomes, particularly for young people. Organizations like Protecting South Dakota Kids were vocal about their concerns that legalization could lead to increased accessibility for minors and potential public health risks, including increased incidents of impaired driving and addiction issues. Some critics also pointed to data from other states, expressing concern that legalization could lead to higher rates of youth cannabis use and mental health challenges.
On the economic side, opponents questioned the supposed financial benefits of cannabis legalization. Although supporters highlighted the potential for tax revenue and job creation, opponents argued that the costs associated with public health, enforcement, and potential social consequences would outweigh these benefits. The prospect of additional regulatory costs and challenges associated with a legalized market was a concern for local government officials as well.
Advocates’ Arguments and the Path Forward
Proponents of recreational cannabis legalization in South Dakota have consistently argued that legalization would bring multiple benefits, including generating significant tax revenue for the state, creating new jobs in the cannabis industry, and reducing the burden on the criminal justice system. They emphasize that a regulated market for recreational cannabis could help eliminate the illicit market, ensuring that consumers have access to safe, tested products and that law enforcement resources are redirected toward more pressing issues.
The repeated rejection of recreational cannabis legalization has prompted advocates to consider new strategies moving forward. Building public awareness and education campaigns could help address the misconceptions and concerns held by voters, especially around public health and safety issues. Engaging with local healthcare professionals, law enforcement, and community leaders might also be crucial in creating a broader understanding of the benefits of legalization and in developing policies that mitigate potential risks.
Looking Forward: Will South Dakota Eventually Legalize Cannabis?
While the failure of the 2024 measure may seem discouraging to advocates, it is not necessarily a final verdict on the issue in South Dakota. As more states across the country continue to legalize cannabis, public opinion on the issue could shift over time. Additionally, future proposals may take a more nuanced approach, focusing on addressing specific voter concerns to gain wider support. Other states’ experiences with legalization could provide valuable insights for South Dakota, helping shape future initiatives that are better aligned with local values and priorities.
The latest vote reflects a broader national conversation about cannabis and how to approach legalization in a way that considers both economic benefits and public health. For now, South Dakota remains one of the states holding out on recreational cannabis, but the ongoing advocacy efforts suggest that the issue will likely return to the ballot in the future.
Sources:
South Dakota marijuana legalization, recreational cannabis, ballot initiative, cannabis policy, public health concerns, economic impact, legalization advocacy, state legislation, South Dakota voters