A Study Suggests That THC Blood Levels Do Not Correlate With Impairment, Adding to the Debate on Drug Policy and Impairment Testing

Introduction

As the legalization of cannabis continues to spread across the globe, the question of how to accurately measure impairment becomes increasingly important. Traditional methods, such as blood tests for THC (the psychoactive component of cannabis), have been called into question by recent research. A study published in the Journal of Psychopharmacology suggests that blood levels of THC do not correlate with impairment, adding a new layer to the ongoing debate on drug policy and impairment testing.

The Study: THC Blood Levels and Impairment

The study, conducted by researchers at the University of Colorado Boulder, involved 121 regular cannabis users. Participants were asked to smoke cannabis at their own pace, after which their THC blood levels were measured and their cognitive and motor skills were tested. The results showed a significant disconnect between THC blood levels and impairment. Some participants with high THC levels showed no signs of impairment, while others with low THC levels showed significant impairment.

Implications for Drug Policy and Impairment Testing

The findings of this study have significant implications for drug policy and impairment testing. Current policies often rely on blood tests to determine impairment, with certain levels of THC considered indicative of impairment. However, if THC blood levels do not accurately reflect impairment, these policies may need to be reevaluated.

• For example, in many jurisdictions, a THC blood level of 5 nanograms per milliliter is considered evidence of impairment. However, this study suggests that such a level may not necessarily indicate impairment, potentially leading to unjust convictions.
• Similarly, in the workplace, drug testing policies often rely on blood tests to determine if an employee is under the influence of cannabis. If these tests are not accurate measures of impairment, they could lead to unfair dismissals or disciplinary actions.

Case Studies: Inconsistencies in Current Policies

There are numerous examples of the inconsistencies and potential injustices that can arise from current drug policies and impairment testing methods. For instance, in 2016, a Montana man was convicted of vehicular homicide while under the influence of cannabis, despite his THC blood levels being below the state’s legal limit. His conviction was based on the testimony of a state toxicologist, who argued that even low levels of THC could cause impairment.

On the other hand, in 2017, a Colorado woman was acquitted of a DUI charge despite her THC blood levels being above the state’s legal limit. Her defense argued that she was a regular cannabis user and therefore had a higher tolerance, meaning her impairment level was not accurately reflected by her THC blood level.

Conclusion: The Need for More Accurate Impairment Testing

The findings of the University of Colorado Boulder study highlight the need for more accurate methods of measuring cannabis impairment. While blood tests for THC may be a convenient method, they do not appear to accurately reflect impairment levels. This has significant implications for drug policy and impairment testing, potentially leading to unjust convictions or unfair workplace practices.

As the legalization of cannabis continues to spread, it is crucial that policymakers and researchers work together to develop more accurate and fair methods of measuring impairment. This will ensure that individuals are not unjustly penalized and that public safety is not compromised.

By C.N.W

Sources:

1. Hartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, et al. Cannabis effects on driving longitudinal control with and without alcohol. J Appl Toxicol. 2016;36(11):1418-1429. doi:10.1002/jat.3255

2. Ramaekers JG, Berghaus G, van Laar M, Drummer OH. Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;73(2):109-119. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2003.10.008

3. Sewell RA, Poling J, Sofuoglu M. The effect of cannabis compared with alcohol on driving. Am J Addict. 2009;18(3):185-193. doi:10.1080/10550490902786934